Scotty is pretty good IMO. He definitely has some leaks, but I'd trade my game for his any day. I think it's a testament to not having to play perfect to play profitably, which gives me a lot of hope actuallly.

lol I hate Scotty and I think he is terrible, but I guess it's a big personal grudge ;p, I think he will never ever do good against most decent regs, and I dont think he'll ever beat high stakes unless he changes alot about his game, but he obv dominates $110s and under

Of course he berated me in chat.
 
 

PokerStars Game #27071211770: Tournament #155750019, $110+$5 Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2009/04/14 2:00:25 ET
Table '155750019 1' 2-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: ScottyBCash (1500 in chips) 
Seat 2: another_rack (1500 in chips) 
ScottyBCash: posts small blind 10
another_rack: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to another_rack [Qs Ks]
ScottyBCash: raises 40 to 60
another_rack: raises 140 to 200
ScottyBCash: calls 140
*** FLOP *** [3c Qh 2c]
another_rack: bets 200
ScottyBCash: calls 200
*** TURN *** [3c Qh 2c] [7c]
another_rack: checks 
ScottyBCash: bets 240
another_rack: calls 240
*** RIVER *** [3c Qh 2c 7c] [8s]
another_rack: checks 
ScottyBCash: bets 860 and is all-in
another_rack: calls 860 and is all-in
*** SHOW DOWN ***
ScottyBCash: shows [5d 4d] (high card Queen)
another_rack: shows [Qs Ks] (a pair of Queens)
another_rack collected 3000 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 3000 | Rake 0 
Board [3c Qh 2c 7c 8s]
Seat 1: ScottyBCash (button) (small blind) showed [5d 4d] and lost with high card Queen
Seat 2: another_rack (big blind) showed [Qs Ks] and won (3000) with a pair of Queens
 
 
 

People that kind of see his major leaks and adjust right do very well against him, more so than your typical regular.
He does dominate a lot of bad players, and that's why I think his ROI is so good.
I don't think I'd prefer to play him at the $115 level, but I'm not upset if he sits me or anything and I think he'd be a pretty soft spot for the average $570-1130 player on Stars.

 I'm not being sarcastic when I say I love villain's line here, and of course, given that villain is good enough to play like this, your line is nastyyyyyyy.  Turn check-call is sickkkkkk.

Yea, there's a reason why Scotty's ROI is good, he can play vs fish postflop.
A good player makes him eat his shit by calling with such trash preflop consistently.  You can't outplay everyone.
Good looking on Rack's turn line, much better than Scotty's bet :)
Edit: Fwiw, I think 300 on the turn is infinitely better vs bad players you're not consistently playing.

 yeah it's funny I had this one hand match and then opened this thread up. As you can imagine I got a lecture :)

 PokerStars Game #27169537809: Tournament #156456410, $110+$5 Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2009/04/16 16:49:20 PT [2009/04/16 19:49:20 ET]
Table '156456410 1' 2-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: ScottyBCash (1450 in chips) 
Seat 2: another_rack (1550 in chips) 
ScottyBCash: posts small blind 10
another_rack: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to another_rack [Qh Qd]
ScottyBCash: raises 40 to 60
another_rack: raises 140 to 200
ScottyBCash: calls 140
*** FLOP *** [4s 5d 9s]
another_rack: bets 240
ScottyBCash: raises 1010 to 1250 and is all-in
another_rack: calls 1010
*** TURN *** [4s 5d 9s] [3c]
*** RIVER *** [4s 5d 9s 3c] [5c]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
another_rack: shows [Qh Qd] (two pair, Queens and Fives)
ScottyBCash: shows [9c Tc] (two pair, Nines and Fives)
another_rack collected 2900 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 2900 | Rake 0 
Board [4s 5d 9s 3c 5c]
Seat 1: ScottyBCash (button) (small blind) showed [9c Tc] and lost with two pair, Nines and Fives
Seat 2: another_rack (big blind) showed [Qh Qd] and won (2900) with two pair, Queens and Fives