Hi I have been playing some heads up sngs on pokerstars like 500 with a roi of 15% in the $55 but i am now thinking about starting to play at fulltilt beacuse i dont like how pokerstars dont open another sitNgo so if it is lets say a good player sitting in a $100 game i do not whant to play him so i have to wait. But if this happens at fulltilt i can just reg in the othereone.
How do you guys do that play the $100+ level at pokerstars I am not that in to 4mans
allso what is the avg at fulltilt ?on pokerstars my avg time is 9,4min
so basically what site do you guys feel is most profitable?
They should both be similarly profitable.
You'll likely have a smaller edge in the FTP turbos, since the games end much faster, but if you can keep playing well in that structure you could make more $/hr, in which case I'd go with FTP.
It's rare to see somebody having so much success and thinking about switching sites though. On Stars you may have to wait your turn for a lobby if you want to avoid regulars, but on FTP you'll be sitting an emptly lobby for longer, since 5+ other regulars that don't want to play each other will be doing the same thing. So lobby wise, I don't see any major advantages to switching.
Since you play at the $55+ level, you should be at platinum star on Stars, on your way towards supernova, so your rakeback % should be very similar to FTP's 27% anyways.
I'd just stick with Stars for now, once you start beating the $100+ levels regularly look towards putting some money on FTP and perhaps playing both until you see one as clearly superior (or continue playing both like so many players do; xSCWx, Spamzor, Primo, Croix, etc.).
totally agree with Ry, just wanted to add that if you get supernova on PS (which I think is quite easy playing the 55 or 110 husngs) you definitely get more rakeback than on fulltiltpoker. check out this graph: http://www.fpppro.com/images/rbevsvpp.jpg