Glad to hear about the heater! :)I prefer c/r flop with the K6 given opponent described. The river is pretty weird - I think jamming is better, because the only draw is the club draw which doesn't always play it like this, and he should have a good amount of 8x that thinks wtf to your river shove. It's close, though.With fish the biggest adjustment you should be making with your draws on paired boards is to just make your check/raise size nice and exploitably big, we don't need to keep it small enough to rep air. So I'd usually make a bigger c/r size here to set up a more comfortable turn jam.

In hand 2, what about betting 125-150 on the turn? Jx and 8x are never folding to your jam, but overcards may well fold to that sizing, and you can jam river vs. them. You also give yourself a chance to evaluate river and fold out 8x with a jam if the flushdraw from the flop hits (although obv he has that sometimes, but it's not as much as 8x). Sucks when 8x jams over you, but it was calling a jam anyway. I don't think you induce that often given the board.Now, that's not to say that I think betting is better than checking on the turn (bleh it's just such a shittastic turn card), but I think betting an amount that sets up a PSish bet on the river is waaayyy better than overjamming turn, given what his range consists of.Not sure about the c/r vs. c/c on the flop, want to hear what mers has to say on that.EDIT: he ninja-posted, response makes sense.

The deeper we are with that T9 hand, the better c/c or check/raise small/fold is going to be, because we are just owned up the wazoo by flush draws, so it becomes a really big problem if we're deeper.

I'm not a big fan of barreling off with the J8hh, but I could be wrong. Basically, it's just too easy to put you on a missed draw on this board, and I've seen fish make hero calls here time and time again with ridiculous stuff. I think you're getting very little in the way of folds on the turn, and while I don't hate the turn bet if the purpose is to set up a river barrel, I still think this is a -EV play.

http://www.handconverter.com/hands/1254120I'm not a fan of barreling turn here, I think too much of his flop calling range continues. On the river it's hard for you to rep Qx by betting this size and I'd give up there, too.

http://www.handconverter.com/hands/1254126I think I would have to continue here, one big benefit actually of being against a tighter player is that he's not going to continue with 6x/flush draws on a turn of turns, so you very often get two streets to realize your equity. I don't think there are as many bad turns as you think - spades suck and so do 7/8/9 to some extent, but non-spade A/K/Q/J/T/6/5/4/3/2 all improve your equity against his range, imo.

http://www.handconverter.com/hands/1258672It's OK to consider folding. It's honestly very close and a spot that's pretty sickening.

http://www.handconverter.com/hands/1258677Another not-fun spot but I think getting it in is fine.

http://www.handconverter.com/hands/1258682You have to call river here.These hands don't feel good, but they aren't going to be a source of big leaks. They're close, gross spots. 

Done!

I mean, it's been a long time since I played the 55s significantly, so I don't want to mislead you about "typical". Most regs have very value-oriented ranges, especially when it comes to big river bets after multiple streets of aggression, but that's not universial either. I would focus on identifying tendencies and exploiting rather than coming in with too many assumptions.

http://www.handconverter.com/hands/1276361I think jamming here and big-ish bet/call are going to be very similar in expectation, I'd usually bet/call.

http://www.handconverter.com/hands/1276362It's close, but I still think I'd contest by calling and check/calling turn to give his air a chance to put the rest in. If we're a little shallower I'd just say nh. It is a really borderline decision whether to go with it or give up, though. I'm trying to make sure I don't bias myself by the fact that it worked. :)

http://www.handconverter.com/hands/1276365 Definitely a bizarre line. I still think you need to call, you don't need very much equity and he will show up with spazz, plus he can have Ax that chops with you.

"4. Hand Lets imagine we have A2-A9 on AJxss. Villain a good reg, raised pre and cbet 50 %. We are 50bb deep. We c/r him a couple of times during this match and he is capable of multi barrel bluffs. Which aces do you c/r and gii and with which do you call him down?"It depends a ton on how he contests vs check/raises. If he'll float, 3bet with flush draws, call 3 streets with Jx, those are all great reasons to check/raise. I guess as somehwat of a default I'm check/raising A7-A9 and check/calling the lower ones given the multi barrel read, but it's a ton based on those type of nuances in his play.

"1. For some calculations I need realistic 3-betting and opening ranges. Could you please check my excel file and give me an evaluation of them? Also which ranges (3b and opening) would you take/assume if you encounter a random. Link: https://rapidshare.com/files/3683934...ng_ranges.xlsx"I'm confused by the link, can't see how to download.I would honestly advise against spreadsheets. For one, they won't calculate it correctly. You can't just do raise/calling range divided by opening range to see how often your jam will get called - it matters whether you have an ace or not, for example. Secondly, I've found people who use spreadsheets like this to come to bad conclusions based on assuming too much.For 3bet shoving I would really study the articles I've written about jamming 20bb deep against a random, and jamming against someone with an increased opening frequency. That's going to be better than just spreadsheets. "2. What type of hands do you limp at 20BB deep against a) readless b) aggressive reg c) passive fish?"I don't limp much readless 20bb deep. Against an aggressive reg, middling hands that can limp/call a 3x are often great to limp instead of raise/fold. Against a passive fish, it depends how loose he is. If he's loose pre and post, limping in with junk can be the best play. If he's tight and passive, I'll raise my junk."3. What is your 3betting (lets say from t40 to t100 or t120) calling range against a) readless b) aggressive reg c) passive fish?"Let me give you some examples. With A9o, I'd jam readless or against the aggressive reg, but fold against the passive fish. With QJo, I'd call readless and against the aggressive reg, but fold against the passive fish. With JTo, I'd fold readless and against the passive fish, and call against the agressive reg. With 75s, I fold to 120 readless and against a passive, but likely jam against an aggressive reg who is 3bet/folding a lot. This is a question that's too dynamic just to say "here are my ranges". "4. What is you plan against an average reg when you call very wide from the BB? Do you c/r a very high percentage? If yes, on which kind of boards? What does your c/calling range looks like?"Again, I think you're looking at things way too simply here. Our c/r percentage on the flop just depends on his opening frequency, his c-betting frequency, and how often he plays back without hands. So sometimes, yes, I c/r a high percentage, and sometimes I barely c/r at all. "5. When do you start calling according to Nash?"The shorter you get the better of an approximation it becomes. I think especially under 8bb it's a very good guide for how wide to call."6. Serkules - What is he doing better/different than the rest?"He's not afraid to take unorthadox lines when he believes the 2+2 consensus is wrong about something. He is always looking for creative ways to contest pots and get value where autopilot would fail. He also just has good discipline and solid fundamental ranges. It's also exceedingly likely by the math of it all that he's run well in his ST career, but no shame in that. "7. I come back from the US in November. How long do you think Hyperturbos on Stars will be profitable (lets say 2-4 % ROI)?"Impossible to say, people have been predicting the demise of STs forever. I think they'll be profitable for quite a good amount of time (years). "8. Do you know ST on Merge? Are they as beatable as the ones on FT/Stars?"They're not, but you do have positive expectation in playing them.

I mean, it's going to depend a lot on stack size, and most people don't jam top x%, they jam good hands and bad hands whenever they feel like it, which makes for a very different calculation. I would download propokertools and evaluate based on more specific situations rather than looking for more universial theories about it.The question about what to do after calling OOP or calling the flop OOP is just too broad to give a very satisfying answer. In general, though, I would say it's OK to have a pretty weak check/calling range, because most opponents don't bluff enough. Against the ones who do, you can expand your check/raising range or call down more often."Can't I just raise 100 % in this case because the raise is in itself profitable?" Yes.

Back to your 1st question, if you haven't seen the fasttrack video from May that went up on HUSNG.com, that helps answer a lot of these questions about what 3bet ranges to expect in a more sufficiently in-depth manner. Let me know if you need me to send the footage to you via Skype.