I've just got a curious question regarding pricing of all coaches of HH reviews vs video.Written hand history reviews are always alot cheaper than recording commentary on a video that the student has recorded and sent in. I'm really just wondering why that was? I mean, for me, if I were a coach it would be much easier and probably even less time consuming to add commentary while I'm watching a video.Written hand historys will take more time by reading and then writting up thoughts and advice and with a video you are just talking and I imagine its alot easier to watch on a video than read the HH's.Be interested to hear what coaches prefer to do and why people believe they are more value for money than HH reviews.Thanks
Written hand history reviews are always alot cheaper" - i dont think this is the case, i think video commentary is good value for money.
Ruskiis4
My HH reviews have always been my cheapest offering, originally it was this way because it was intended to reach a lower stakes player (whereas a $50-100 dollar hourly rate for live sweats was more designed for $50+ level players budget wise).But my video review prices (for the husng.com published one especially) now rival the HH review prices, they probably make me $40-50 per hour versus the standard hourly, due to the extra time spent on video and HH reviews.That's my personal explanation, I'll probably clear up my coaching page later this month once I finish a few other projects here on the site.I'm not sure which other coaches might have a cheaper HH review per hour type rate (HH reviews are usually per hand, but you can figure out the hourly if you're a coach that knows how much time you spend on them), but I would imagine the gap between my rates is larger than most here.