There's nothing wrong with playing on Ipoker with $5 rake on $100 level games.Our betmost deal gets you 40% guaranteed, up to 60% VIP (basically rakeback).Another 20% during bonus clearing as well.Even at 40% though, that takes the actual rake down to $3.---If you are considering getting into the $200 levels and higher, Party Poker is very soft (their rake caps out at $10). 

Titan sells your address, just as a side note.

Party's 109+ are not soft :)

I may ask the wrong people these types of questions, but it should be softer than Ipoker, PokerStars, Merge and Revolution.It should also have more traffic than Ongame, Microgaming and 888 for HUSNGs.So unless I'm mistaken on the above, it would at least be able to claim "no larger site is softer than Party for $200+."I could be wrong though, I don't play Party, but I do talk to multiple guys that have and do.It could also be one of those "it depends on the player" type things.Like on Stars at $200s, if you're a guy with good stats and the other regs respect your gameplay enough, you just wait your turn, sit and get players ranging from horrible fish to very marginal regulars. Now if you are a brand new player and you sit the $60s, you're going to probably get a higher caliber of players than the $200 level guy I just mentioned, simply because the $60 regs that will sit you over and over are going to be better on avg than the $200 fish + marginal reg combination you'll face as a respected $200 player.So, it can certainly depend.

Weren't you planning on adding WPT Poker to your affiliated pokerrooms?

According to another affiliate WPT and PP do share their playerpools meaning; if someone was registered at PP before he joined HUSNG.com he would have a possibility to play tracked over you.

Hey!Didnt want to make a new topic, but i have a question about traffic on Revolution networkThe rake and the structure of hyper-turbos is the same as Pokerstars offers, but on Revolution network the rakeback is 36%. I wont make supernova this year so it looks silly to play on Pokerstars with goldstars rakeback.How is the action there at 7-15$? If i have to wait for a few minutes after every game then it probably wont be worh it because games per hour will be much lower then in PS. Any ideas or suggestions?

Revolution vs Pokerstars:7'sPokerstars: 2.19% rake and 1.73% after 21% rakeback as a goldstarRevolution: 2.04% rake and 1.31% after 36% rakeback15'sPokerstars: 2.11% rake and 1.67% after rakebackRevolution: 2.04% rake and 1.31% after rakebackthe question now comes as to traffic and software. Pokerstars software may allow more hands per minute and more games per hour and of course traffic will be higher than Revolution. The player pools will be the difference and if it is similiar to Merge there may be more TAG's on Revolution than Stars.I think that the ROI will be higher on Revolution due to less rake and the player pool but the hourly will be much higher on Pokerstars.I haven't tried Revolution yet, but as Rypac mentioned above there will be a deal soon so I can try it out!This of course is my analysis I did for the two sites and I could be completely out to lunch!Also as caveat I am in North America so when it comes time for me to donk around the traffic is highest on Merge and Revolution as compared to iPoker and other European facing sites so for me traffic is like this:1. Pokerstars2. Merge3. PartyPoker4. Revolution5. Bodog - ( hard to tell might be ahead of Revolution)6. iPoker/Winning Poker NetworkSo, if you are in Europe -Merge and Revolution will fall well below Microgaming, iPoker, IGT, Boss and most likely Sky and PKR.6.