You've certainly been lucky in pots that ended up all in (running above equity adjusted line).
But
Sample size is too small to conclude anything about your edge (+ve or -ve) in the games.
Your equity adjusted line is declining over a small sample.
You're not neccessarily playing with a negative edge.
All in adjusted equity line is simply that: your results adjusted for all in equity. https://www.pokertracker.com/guides/PT4/tutorials/all-in-equity-graphs
While equity adjusted graphs are a better measure of your results than your raw results, they do not converge with your theoretical EV line until your sample size is very large.
Maybe so large that it would not even practically be possible to play enough games to be sure of your edge.
So focus on your decision making, not your graphs :)
Well you never know exactly on a small sample what is due to variance, but it should motivate you to keep improving your game. One possibility is that after the brutal downswing you experienced around tournament 265 you started tilting/changing things in your game for the worst, but only looking at your actual hands will give you an answer.
It seems you are running like God in all-in pots even when you are behind.
Start reviewing your shove/call ranges, they seem pretty marginal.
You've certainly been lucky in pots that ended up all in (running above equity adjusted line).
But
Sample size is too small to conclude anything about your edge (+ve or -ve) in the games.
Your equity adjusted line is declining over a small sample.
You're not neccessarily playing with a negative edge.
All in adjusted equity line is simply that: your results adjusted for all in equity.
https://www.pokertracker.com/guides/PT4/tutorials/all-in-equity-graphs
While equity adjusted graphs are a better measure of your results than your raw results, they do not converge with your theoretical EV line until your sample size is very large.
Maybe so large that it would not even practically be possible to play enough games to be sure of your edge.
So focus on your decision making, not your graphs :)
Well you never know exactly on a small sample what is due to variance, but it should motivate you to keep improving your game. One possibility is that after the brutal downswing you experienced around tournament 265 you started tilting/changing things in your game for the worst, but only looking at your actual hands will give you an answer.