6 posts / 0 new
Last post
Isidro1's picture
C Net Adjusted or Expected Chips Won?

My question is which line should i pay attention to and why.

I have heard that Ev line just shows the chips you should have won in a all in situation but i don't understand why this line is that far from the C net adjusted. Im not trying to explain myself better because im too limitated at English :(

But i would really apreciate a large explanation about the interpretation of every line.

Thank you so much :)

 

Barrin's picture
http://www.husng.com/content/

Hi.

Isidro1's picture
Than you brah, and sorry for

Than you brah, and sorry for the repeated thread. If someone can delete it, feel free.

Isidro1's picture
Barrin, i have read all your

Barrin, i have read all your replies, but it didnt give me answers about my question. I was afking about the difference between Ev line and C net adjusted line. Which of these lines should i believe-trust in? Which of them gives me the real expectation? (Sorry again for my terrible english 

Thank you in advance

Barrin's picture
If you wanna know how much

If you wanna know how much money you should had won, you stick to the c net adjusted ($). If you wanna win how money chips you should have won, you stick to the ev line (Chips).

Example: If you lose 10 $15 games, but win a $1000 hu sng, your chips are down 4500 (this might not be the case since it are net EXPECTED chips), but your $ value is up (you won the more valueable matches). Anyhow, your sample size is to small to make judgment about any of those lines and they should not really matter to you, unless you are looking for staking, since they do not tell you, if you played well, but only if you got lucky or unlucky.

Hi.

Dipl.Komp.'s picture
but i don't understand why

but i don't understand why this line is that far from the C net adjusted.

 

that´s fairly simple: look at the legend of the y-axis. both $ and chips are projected on the axis. they never align. they are similar in shape, but the proportions are different. it´s kind of a pseudo logarithmic effect.