When viewing your graph in $ mode, use "Overlay net adjusted" instead of "all-in equity" as the later is in chips rather than dollars so your graph will be misleading (the graph you showed has the yellow line in chips, and the green line in dollars, and has two different y axis as a result).
Sorry for my English. Just change what you provided me . Now I do not like my graphics . I feel I'm doing wrong . Could you please explain what's happening ?
You have net winnings of $10.26 over 3,564 games with an ROI of 0.08%.
Your net winnings, adjusted for your all in equity is approx - $160.
Your total invested = 10.26 / 0.0008 = $12,825
Implying that adjusted for all in equity over this sample you have an ROI = -160 / 12825 = - 0.012457 = -1.2%.
Or in other words: you ran good.
Note that your expected chips won does not appear to account for rake. Rake in hyper turbos is approx 2% so over 3,564 games this total = 3564 * 0.02 ~ 71.3 buyins.
Which given your buyin buys you 500 chips, you can estimate the effect of rake roughly vs your expected chips won by subtracting = 500 * 71.3 = 35,650 chips.
Your graph has expected chips won = 30,000
So adjusted for rake your net expected chips won = 30000 - 35650 = - 5,650
Note that the chip adjustment method is quite crude. You should simply rely on the green & orange lines on your graph for guaging how lucky or unlucky you were in all in pots.
That said, it is gaining increasing popularity to start goals posts on this site which contain no strategic review of the post owner's hands. There is a lot of graph spamming which is a complete waste of time for both the poster & the reader with respect to getting better at poker imo. If you want to be a "HU-HYPER MONSTER" I suggest you should posts spots where you are unsure of the correct decision within the context of everything you know about your opponent up to the point that the hand was played.
That said, it is gaining increasing popularity to start goals posts on this site which contain no strategic review of the post owner's hands. There is a lot of graph spamming which is a complete waste of time for both the poster & the reader with respect to getting better at poker imo. If you want to be a "HU-HYPER MONSTER" I suggest you should posts spots where you are unsure of the correct decision within the context of everything you know about your opponent up to the point that the hand was played.
thank you!
more strategy talk instead of comparing the length of poker genitals would make the site a lot more interesting to read. it´s been very quiet lately in the strategy talk department...
When viewing your graph in $ mode, use "Overlay net adjusted" instead of "all-in equity" as the later is in chips rather than dollars so your graph will be misleading (the graph you showed has the yellow line in chips, and the green line in dollars, and has two different y axis as a result).
Good luck in your quest!
Sorry for my English. Just change what you provided me . Now I do not like my graphics . I feel I'm doing wrong . Could you please explain what's happening ?
You have net winnings of $10.26 over 3,564 games with an ROI of 0.08%.
Your net winnings, adjusted for your all in equity is approx - $160.
Your total invested = 10.26 / 0.0008 = $12,825
Implying that adjusted for all in equity over this sample you have an ROI = -160 / 12825 = - 0.012457 = -1.2%.
Or in other words: you ran good.
Note that your expected chips won does not appear to account for rake. Rake in hyper turbos is approx 2% so over 3,564 games this total = 3564 * 0.02 ~ 71.3 buyins.
Which given your buyin buys you 500 chips, you can estimate the effect of rake roughly vs your expected chips won by subtracting = 500 * 71.3 = 35,650 chips.
Your graph has expected chips won = 30,000
So adjusted for rake your net expected chips won = 30000 - 35650 = - 5,650
Note that the chip adjustment method is quite crude. You should simply rely on the green & orange lines on your graph for guaging how lucky or unlucky you were in all in pots.
That said, it is gaining increasing popularity to start goals posts on this site which contain no strategic review of the post owner's hands. There is a lot of graph spamming which is a complete waste of time for both the poster & the reader with respect to getting better at poker imo. If you want to be a "HU-HYPER MONSTER" I suggest you should posts spots where you are unsure of the correct decision within the context of everything you know about your opponent up to the point that the hand was played.
thank you!
more strategy talk instead of comparing the length of poker genitals would make the site a lot more interesting to read. it´s been very quiet lately in the strategy talk department...
cheers
s.