No Limit Holdem Tournament • 2 Players • PokerStars
$988.80+$11.20
Hand converted by the official HUSNG.com hand converter
SB | mrGR33N13 | 500 | |
BB | Chimp92 | 500 |
Effective Stacks: 25bb
Blinds 10/20
Pre-Flop (30, 2 players)
mrGR33N13 raises to 40, Chimp92 raises to 80, mrGR33N13 calls 40
Flop (160, 2 players)
Chimp92 bets 40, mrGR33N13 calls 40
Turn (240, 2 players)
Chimp92 bets 40, mrGR33N13 calls 40
River (320, 2 players)
Chimp92 checks, mrGR33N13 goes all-in 340, Chimp92 goes all-in 340
Final Pot: 1000
mrGR33N13 shows a pair of Sixes
Chimp92 shows a pair of Queens
Chimp92 wins 1000 ( won +500 )
mrGR33N13 lost -500
=======
No Limit Holdem Tournament • 2 Players • PokerStars
$988.80+$11.20
Hand converted by the official HUSNG.com hand converter
SB | mrGR33N13 | 500 | |
BB | 00Doug | 500 |
Effective Stacks: 25bb
Blinds 10/20
Pre-Flop (30, 2 players)
mrGR33N13 raises to 40, 00Doug calls 20
Flop (80, 2 players)
00Doug checks, mrGR33N13 bets 40, 00Doug calls 40
Turn (160, 2 players)
00Doug checks, mrGR33N13 bets 90, 00Doug calls 90
River (340, 2 players)
00Doug checks, mrGR33N13 bets 80, 00Doug goes all-in 330, mrGR33N13 goes all-in 250
Final Pot: 1000
mrGR33N13 shows a pair of Kings
00Doug shows a pair of Tens
mrGR33N13 wins 1000 ( won +500 )
00Doug lost -500
=======
No Limit Holdem Tournament • 2 Players • PokerStars
$988.80+$11.20
Hand converted by the official HUSNG.com hand converter
SB | Chimp92 | 500 | |
BB | mrGR33N13 | 500 |
Effective Stacks: 25bb
Blinds 10/20
Pre-Flop (30, 2 players)
Chimp92 raises to 60, mrGR33N13 calls 40
Flop (120, 2 players)
mrGR33N13 bets 60, Chimp92 calls 60
Turn (240, 2 players)
mrGR33N13 bets 120, Chimp92 goes all-in 380, mrGR33N13 goes all-in 260
River (1000, 2 players, 2 all-in)
Final Pot: 1000
Chimp92 shows a pair of Fours
mrGR33N13 shows a pair of Eights
mrGR33N13 wins 1000 ( won +500 )
Chimp92 lost -500
=======
No Limit Holdem Tournament • 2 Players • PokerStars
$988.80+$11.20
Hand converted by the official HUSNG.com hand converter
SB | mrGR33N13 | 500 | |
BB | Serg999 | 500 |
Effective Stacks: 25bb
Blinds 10/20
Pre-Flop (30, 2 players)
mrGR33N13 calls 10, Serg999 raises to 60, mrGR33N13 calls 40
Flop (120, 2 players)
Serg999 checks, mrGR33N13 bets 50, Serg999 calls 50
Turn (220, 2 players)
Serg999 checks, mrGR33N13 bets 90, Serg999 calls 90
River (400, 2 players)
Serg999 checks, mrGR33N13 goes all-in 300, Serg999 goes all-in 300
Final Pot: 1000
mrGR33N13 shows two pair, Queens and Nines
Serg999 shows a straight, Eight to Queen
Serg999 wins 1000 ( won +500 )
mrGR33N13 lost -500
=======
No Limit Holdem Tournament • 2 Players • PokerStars
$988.80+$11.20
Hand converted by the official HUSNG.com hand converter
SB | Chimp92 | 500 | |
BB | mrGR33N13 | 500 |
Effective Stacks: 25bb
Blinds 10/20
Pre-Flop (30, 2 players)
Chimp92 raises to 40, mrGR33N13 calls 20
Flop (80, 2 players)
mrGR33N13 checks, Chimp92 bets 40, mrGR33N13 calls 40
Turn (160, 2 players)
mrGR33N13 checks, Chimp92 bets 80, mrGR33N13 calls 80
River (320, 2 players)
mrGR33N13 checks, Chimp92 goes all-in 340,
mrGR33N13 said, "thanks for paying for my flight and hotel"
mrGR33N13 said, "for main event"
mrGR33N13 said, "withg that bet"
mrGR33N13 goes all-in 340
Final Pot: 1000
Chimp92 shows two pair, Queens and Sevens
mrGR33N13 shows a straight, Nine to King
mrGR33N13 wins 1000 ( won +500 )
Chimp92 lost -500
=======
Dan Colman
Sorry for my bad English.
I can't understand why Dan made all-in on the river.
In most case, only better hands(straight or flush...) might call the all-in, most weak Qx or Tx might fold.
Is it to balance the bluffs?
River shove with two pair on that kinds of board is standard or good play?
Usually, I made thin value bet and fold or just check back.
In addition, I made thin value bet to balance in some case of nut or almost nut, too.
Probably some history there we don't know about.
Could easily be Dan's image made him feel he'd get called really light and that the opponent can't have a lot of better hands given the way the opponent played the hand.
I'm not sure Dan would limp Q9o that often at 25bb too, probably some dynamics with this opponent would explain the play.