I think a 6% ROI in the turbo speed games, particularly on Full Tilt, is a pretty solid start.Over 5k game samples, consistent winning results of 5-6% or higher at the lower two levels and probably 3-4% or higher at the $55-115 I think would be the lower range of solid success.The number of tables, how you game select (waiting in lobbies for weaker players takes time but leads to higher potential edges) and what site you play on will all impact how good these numbers are. I wouldn't say a 3-4% ROI single tabling at the $55 level on a second tier site where you mostly play fish is very good, but it's not bad (it just really means there's a lot more potential edge for you to gain as you improve).
The generalization I hear most are that FTP randoms are more aggressive and that Stars ones are more loose passive.
I'm not sure that applies across the board. I tend to have my students send in leakfinders and HHs addressing specific needs (or a lot of decisions within a match) so on FTP I probably don't have as good of a handle on the average player differences compared to Stars.
I'd say all low stakes games offered tend to have looser than usual players in them.
At the higher stakes, you get various opinions. I've only played super turbos on full tilt and at higher stakes, so my experience doesn't lend to a natural comparison too well.
Probably an incorrect generalization, but I think stars players are more loose than FTP players. I don't know of many FTP turbo players with 6%+ in the higher stakes. Croixdawg is one. I'd be interested to know of any others?
well my $23 roi jumped up to 21% roi after joining this great site from negative roi. combining with my previous lost it averages out to 6%.so i think i should be doing ok as i continue to study and improve my husng. i am happy.
I think a 6% ROI in the turbo speed games, particularly on Full Tilt, is a pretty solid start.Over 5k game samples, consistent winning results of 5-6% or higher at the lower two levels and probably 3-4% or higher at the $55-115 I think would be the lower range of solid success.The number of tables, how you game select (waiting in lobbies for weaker players takes time but leads to higher potential edges) and what site you play on will all impact how good these numbers are. I wouldn't say a 3-4% ROI single tabling at the $55 level on a second tier site where you mostly play fish is very good, but it's not bad (it just really means there's a lot more potential edge for you to gain as you improve).
Ryan, do you think Fulltilt opponents are weaker on average than stars?
The generalization I hear most are that FTP randoms are more aggressive and that Stars ones are more loose passive.
I'm not sure that applies across the board. I tend to have my students send in leakfinders and HHs addressing specific needs (or a lot of decisions within a match) so on FTP I probably don't have as good of a handle on the average player differences compared to Stars.
I'd say all low stakes games offered tend to have looser than usual players in them.
At the higher stakes, you get various opinions. I've only played super turbos on full tilt and at higher stakes, so my experience doesn't lend to a natural comparison too well.
Probably an incorrect generalization, but I think stars players are more loose than FTP players. I don't know of many FTP turbo players with 6%+ in the higher stakes. Croixdawg is one. I'd be interested to know of any others?
well my $23 roi jumped up to 21% roi after joining this great site from negative roi. combining with my previous lost it averages out to 6%.so i think i should be doing ok as i continue to study and improve my husng. i am happy.