Thanks for the feedback.

We'll try to work in some more interviews.

As far as content goes, we've been trying.  We were critisized a bit earlier in the year when we had 15-20 new videos up a month (compared to 12-15 in the last few months) because people wanted more "flashy" players with good stats.

So we're working on getting a few more big names here, and big names cost more money, meaning we can put up less videos.

I try to look out for the quality of the videos first and foremost. 

As an example, I believe instructors such as Cog Dissonance and PrimordialAA have probably taught a majority of our members more that will make them profitable than a few videos from [insert random non husng.com SS leaderboard player] ever could or would, yet if you ask the random member, they probably will opt for the random high stakes guy.

So, we are trying to get some high stakes players that actually care enough about the videos to do them consistently and do them at a high enough quality.  We're not all about hiring a name to do one or two videos and not respond to member questions or put in 100% effort, and I believe some of the lesser known guys that make videos on our site are a tremendous value to the members and have continued to help our members make great improvements in their games.  I would definitely put money that our site has helped the average member make a bigger difference in their poker income than any other training site, speaking in terms of averages.  And that is due to the hard work and dedication that our winning instructors put in.

Now, you personally, you do play higher levels than our average member, so I can see more clearly where you are coming from.  We've put up a lot of $100+ level videos lately and will continue to in the future.

The one other thing I'd like to mention is the way the site is setup.  Users can pay $120 for their initial month and download something like 200 videos from the site.  That's almost as little as 50 cents a video.  Now, renewal is cheaper, at $65, and you'll get around 15 new videos upon renewal (also access to any of the 200 previous videos you did not download yet).  So yes, the cost per video is a few multiples higher for renewal, but I can't see any way around it.  In a perfect world, I'd rather just charge $200+ for 1st month and have renewals cost something like $30, but then lower stakes players would struggle to afford a full membership.  We do have the video pack options, but this site is built for low and mid stakes players to be able to beat their games and continue to move up successfully and I think that raising the initial month and lowering the renewal, while technically more fair and accurate, would turn too many potential members off to the site.