Villain is an overaggressive loose player who's 3betting wide.He likes as a standard to attack on flops and rivers - very little if no action on turns.Effective Stacks: 35bb Blinds 15/30 Pre-Flop (45, 2 players) Hero is BTN Hero raises to 60, Villain raises to 195, Hero calls 135 Flop (390, 2 players) Villain bets 195, Hero calls 195 Turn (780, 2 players) Villain checks, Hero checks River (780, 2 players) Villain bets 1555Hero has 665 left.My reasoning:Preflop I call to keep in all the worst hands: I know for sure that is 3betting also with worst kings, and various connectors.The flop for him is a cbet with the whole range. I'm glad to see two Aces on the board, not excited at all with the 9 wicth hits a lot of his connectors.Turn is a bad card (all his connectors have hit the board now) and I check behind.On the river I think that 9x - 8x - small and medium pairs would go for a showdown and given that the turn has gone check/check even some his Ax should go for a check/call line because he's seen me value bet worst than Ax in this spots.Is this correct or you see some flaws?
If he's 3betting quite wide, I actually prefer 4bet/calling it off with KJs at this stack depth. Him losing 20% of his stack instead of getting the chance to win the pot with his weaker hands isn't the worst thing in the world, expectation-wise. He can also flat the 4bet with the same sorts of dominated hands.With only 665 back after his flop bet, I think jamming is likely better than letting him realize his equity on turn and river.