Hey I plotted out how the blinds change over what length of time and it seems that PS Turbos should run about the same length of time as a FTP Regular speed. Was wondering if people who have played both agree about that? It is important because the rake difference is such that you could give up rakeback on FTP on the Regulars to play the Turbos on PS with just Platinum rewards. ps...How many PS turbos do you expect to play per hour over a decent sample?
My PS turbos last around 9.5min on average...that's $30s+. No clue about FTP reg speeds to be honest, but they're fairly similar.Depends a lot on your style. If you play Cog's limping style, matches will last longer, and if you're very aggro when blinds are high, matches will last shorter.
__________________________
Goats!!! MORE GOATS!!!
the difference is that Full Tilt has extra levels 10-20, 15-30, 20-40, 25-50, 30-60, 40-80, 50-100Pokerstars 10-20, 15-30, 25-50, 50-100 so Pokerstars should be faster on average
I historically had 11.5 minutes per match on Stars $115 turbos. That might be lower now, aggression is higher in these games over the last year or so.Full Tilt's structure allows more time at the mid stacks in particular, so if you are confident in your mid to end game, stick with those. You could also play both, they are two fairly similar structures (compared to Stars reg speeds and FTP turbos at least).But killng one and not the other shouldn't be a likely result.
The reason for my question is that I am on FTP w/rakeback now. In the future, I will be moving back to PS eventually because of greater game selection and the smaller rake. And because Howard Lederer and Steve Z pissed me off one episode of PAD. :(And given that I want to play regulars on FTP and turbos on PS because it seems that there structure is more alike than FTP turbos and PS turbos.