I thought it'd be fun to review some hands against them today. Some background: They sat me and i just LOLd in a 720 4-man. Their image of us both is that of pretty nitty, inferior players, scared money especially when playing them. Some of that is true (H2Olga is a better player than I am), but their image of what we are (and aren't) capable of was something to take advantage of. Let's talk about a couple hand histories.
Hand #1:
BB | riyyc225 | 1320 | |
SB | Hero | 1680 |
Effective Stacks: 44bb
Blinds 15/30
Pre-Flop (45, 2 players)
Hero is SB
Hero raises to 60, riyyc225 calls 30
Preflop, 82s has just a little too much going for it to just openfold. We have to be careful not to get abused when we open a wide range against an opponent who thinks we're too nitty - a common response to that is to 3bet a wide range, which is even more effective when we're opening a wide range. Still, I think I can use my image to bluff a lot postflop which adds to our equity from choosing to play the hand.
Flop (120, 2 players)
riyyc225 checks, Hero checks
This is a flop that hits his flatting range pretty hard, and I decide to check back, especially because I had just been aggressive in taking down the first couple of pots, which was enough in my mind to turn a marginal c-betting decision in a checkback. I suspected that he would lead the turn with a lot of his value hands and draws, allowing me to make a delayed c-bet on certain turns a good amount of the time vs a range that would fold to it a good bit. I can also go big on representing A/K/J/7 turn cards, because those are all very feasibly in my flop checking behind range.
Turn (120, 2 players)
riyyc225 checks, Hero bets 80, riyyc225 calls 80
On the turn, a king comes off, and he checks. Given what he likely perceives most of my flop checking range to be (Ax/Jx/7x, maybe some pocket pairs), I think he expects most of that range (which he can get some value out of with Kx/Qx/Jackwithextraequity) to check back the turn as well, so he very likely is leading a lot of his value hands. It's a reasonable turn to check/raise with some very big hands, though: I can be checking behind my Kx on the flop and will be betting it on the turn, which leads to a good check/raise opportunity considering that I will have top pair a good bit. However, the overwhelming point I want to make here is that I think he has very little Kx in his range once he checks the turn, and we rep Kx perfectly when I bet it. That's a huge advantage for me. He's not going to fold his pairs/draws regardless, though, so it's important that we follow through on a lot of rivers.
River (280, 2 players)
riyyc225 checks, Hero bets 150,
This is one river it's definitely important to follow up on. If our checking back the flop range is mostly fairly weak hands/showdown value, check/calling the turn is a pretty weird line for him to take with most flush draws. He should lead the turn to fold out my ace highs and low pairs, along with repping Kx/better hands well so that he can fold me out with a double barrel. Meanwhile, my line makes sense for a flush draw: I checked back some Axcc, Jxcc, or junkcc, bet the turn once I picked it up, and followed through on the river.
On the river, it's really important to pick a sizing here that both makes it look like it's possible I have Kx, or a completed flush. Since the majority of hands in his range are fairly weak, it still makes sense not to go too big on the river with a flush (bigger would be fine too, with a flush, he wouldn't think twice about putting that in my range). 150 is small enough though that I rep Kx still very well, too. Thus, I think we get the desired result a very large percentage of the time when we are perceived as a nit:
riyyc225 folds
Hand #2:
SB | riyyc225 | 1495 | |
BB | Hero | 1505 |
Effective Stacks: 37bb
Blinds 20/40
Pre-Flop (60, 2 players)
Hero is BB
riyyc225 raises to 80, Hero calls 40.
Flop (160, 2 players)
Hero checks, riyyc225 bets 80, Hero raises to 200, riyyc225 calls 120
For the second hand, we pick up A4o 37bb deep, which is a pretty easy flat of a minraise versus everybody preflop. On the flop, riyyc c-bets a board he's going to lead a ton of the time. We can definitely flat call here, and that would be my standard against most players. However, most players aren't going to attack weakness as much as riyyc likely will given his perception of me. Check/calling this flop is pretty dang weak in general - it's going to be a lot of 3x/2x/Ax/KJ type stuff that can be barreled off on a lot of turns. Given how he sees me, I can get away with check/raising this board without too much of a worry of him 3betting the flop without a very big hand. I expect to get a lot of folds to the small raise and a decent amount of flats, playing a ton better this way against his air (not letting it hit pairs or bluff and put us in awful spots) and also better vs 3x/2x/Ax/continuing overs because we can barrell off and get a lot of credit due to our image. It's also worth noting that there's no flush draw on this flop, so no easy draw to put us on.
Turn (560, 2 players)
Hero bets 240, riyyc225 calls 240
On the turn, I really like a smaller sizing given our reads. It sets up a river shove well, represents an inducing hand well, and makes his life pretty difficult. The thing is, if we bet bigger, he can actually very easily just jam over 8x without worrying about it too much, but he can't do that nearly as comfortably if we bet smaller. Keep in mind that we're not deep enough for 33/22 to be shoves pre, so those are still well in our range here. Given that he expects most of our check/raise/continue range to be fairly strong here, getting it all-in on the turn with one pair isn't something he can comfortably do: A lot of the time, he's just donating to bigger hands and folding out trash, and there's not nearly as much value in folding out draws or forcing draws to get it in. The bet size freezes him with a lot of range because of our image. Very often, against thinking players when you have a nitty image, your turn betsizing mainly serves to set up your river bluff, rather than a line of "I got to get him out, ok that didn't work, let me try my hardest on the turn, or that didn't work, now one last time on the river". Thinking players give you a lot of credibility when your sizing doesn't look like you're trying to bluff them out on every street, especially when you are perceived as value betting most of the time.
River (1040, 2 players)
Hero goes all-in 985
Now look at our situation based on our image. We check/raised the flop, which he doesn't expect us to do very wide. We continued on the turn, which he doesn't expect us to do very often. Finally, the draw that came up on the turn, and might have caused us to decide to continue to bluff, comes in on the river. We have to jam this river, needing a fold less than 50% of the time for it to be profitable.
One last point: I timed down for a good while before jamming this river, even after I had made my decision. This is somewhat of a reverse timing tell: In general, most people will not time down before making big bluffs. Psychologically, the longer it is that it's your turn, the longer it feels to you like people are putting you under scruitiny and watching you, which leads people to bluff less often after taking more time. That's not to say quicker jams are always weaker, or that you should snap fold whenever someone hits the timebank, but it's a useful tendency to know about. Additionally, I timed down a bit because I wanted to continue to rep one of the primary hands in my range, strong 8x. strong 8x I believe is well ahead of his river calling range, but it conceivably would need some time to decide this, especially if I were scared money. After a time down of his own...
riyyc225 folds
After our matches, my 4man pard and I conferred on how they went. "ran a lot of big bluffs", i just LOLd typed in AIM, before I even had a chance to talk about my game. "He thinks I'm such a nit".
The essential understanding: Take advantage of when your opponent has the wrong idea about your frequencies or your ability to adapt them.
mers
nice post!!
I think most (if not all) people in this forum understand the basic strategy adjustment: If your opponent thinks you're too tight, bluff more. My hope is that demonstrating all the reasoning for these two situations helps make clearer when and how you do that and just more advanced "my range against his range" type thinking. We happen to get the result we wanted in both hands, but obviously he calls both sometimes as well, the point isn't "look how I owned this guy", but rather to talk about when and how to adjust and use our best analysis to come to well-reasoned decisions, especially against tough players.
nice hands sir
great post mers, im printing it :pmore stuff like this would be awesome, ty
awesome, more of this please :D
Would be nice to see more of this
i notice you're playing livb atm. any chance of a game review or something of the match?
There didn't end up being too much to talk about. A couple of interesting hands:No Limit Holdem Tournament • 2 Players$720 + $30 Heads Up Shootout Hand converted by the official HUSNG.com hand converter BBlivb1121680 SBHero1320 Effective Stacks: 33bb Blinds 20/40 Pre-Flop (60, 2 players) Hero is SB Hero raises to 80, livb112 calls 40 Flop (160, 2 players) livb112 bets 80, Hero calls 80 Livb is very aggressive with contesting pots OOP, either by raising or donkbetting. That said, I felt very sure that given his high check/raise frequency and all of the hands I could play back at him or continue with, he would check/raise with his Jx, and I also felt he wouldn't lead like this often with his 8x, where he's happy to gobble up a cbet with all of my inferior hands that don't usually have that much equity. So, I figure his first donkbet of the match here was likely a range of draws (gutshots, fds), junk that knows it only needs a fold 1/3 of the time on a board that hits a flatter's range pretty well, or Kx/Ax type hands that livb would prefer to play this way then check/calling (or check/raising) a bet and continuing in the hand that way. When he check/calls with those hands, he gives me control of the betting and the ability to realize my equity a lot better. Additionally, he may feel donking with Ax/Kx can have the benefit of me trying to bluff when and ace or a king comes off (because they are also in the range of cards I can flat this donkbet with), which adds to the equity of the play.So that range is pretty damn weak, why not raise? The biggest problem is that I know livb will take this line with his flush draws and jam over the flop raise, which is a disaster. I mean, I could get super cheeky and raise/call it off with just ace high, but we both know that I can't be confident enough in my reads that he wouldn't do this with a made hand to do that, especially considering we're actually behind a lot of flush draws. So we do the sensible thing and call.Turn (320, 2 players) livb112 checks, Hero bets 180, livb112 calls 180Now, let's evaluate that flop range after this turn card rolls off: No draws or air improved. I think a lot of people would check back the turn here, but I think we have to bet. We don't rep Jx super well (it would likely raise the flop), but we do rep 8x just fine, and livb will not expect us to be bet/folding 8x here considering how strange of a line his would be for Jx. Thus, we can safely bet this turn without fear of getting bluffed from him thinking we're floating or have a draw - we're protected by the 8x in our range, and probably also by the image that we won't be making this kind of bet with ace high. The bet serves to get value from his draws (or fold them out, either is a better outcome than us checking behind and letting him have a card. He will be unlikely to bluff the river). It also makes his life difficult with Ax/Kx - I don't think he's folding Ax to a bet, but he may if he thinks I'm particularly nitty, and I actually think he may call with Kx, expecting there to be a lot of draws in my range and for me to not be betting a hand like ace high or a lower pair like this. River (680, 2 players) livb112 checks, Hero checks Unfortunately, this is not the card to follow up for value or for bluff. We don't rep Jx well enough ourselves to take advantage of the fact that he doesn't either, we may not be betting 8x for value on the river which makes our life difficult in terms of betting to get Ax out of the hand. Given that we're not folding out a lot worse or getting much better to call, we make the (common sense, probably) checkback. Final Pot: 680 livb112 shows three of a kind, Jacks Hero shows three of a kind, Jacks
Just a quick reminder for the second hand:No Limit Holdem Tournament • 2 Players$720 + $30 Heads Up Shootout Hand converted by the official HUSNG.com hand converter SBlivb1121230 BBHero1770 Effective Stacks: 25bb Blinds 25/50 Pre-Flop (75, 2 players) Hero is BB livb112 raises to 100, Hero calls 50 Even though livb opens a very high percentage and plays well postflop, I still think 25bb deep is too deep to 3bet jam a hand like A4o. I think the equity from flatting is going to be decent enough as well, especially considering what fun it is when an ace high board comes and we don't rep a lot. The only people I would jam A4 against are those who call really really wide after opening 100% (like calling K8, for example, we're like 60% there and that extra stuff makes it worth the wide jam). Livb actually does call too wide especially 20bb deep, but not THAT wide particularly 25bb deep. Flop (200, 2 players) Hero checks, livb112 bets 100, Hero raises to 250, livb112 goes all-in 1130, Hero calls 880 The quick reminder is just how important is to raise here against a thinking, aggressive opponent. Yes, we have a weak ace, that is all kinds of crushed versus better Ax and 8x. Still, most people do not float these kind of flops, and we can't expect livb to put us on a pure float when we check/call and hope he barrels off. In order to have air in our range, we have to raise. It's a flop that misses a big portion of his large opening range, and we both are very aware of that. Raing the flop also puts more money in with the flush draw being the most common hand for me to have here, along with air (if I'm competent), 8x, and some rare Ax.Against that kind of range, livb can't hate his life with his pocket pairs and his big flush draws, or even his little flush draws. All of that is either ahead of a lot of my range, or can jam and have easily enough equity in the hand plus fold equity against my range.Turn (2460, 2 players, 1 all-in) River (2460, 2 players, 1 all-in) Final Pot: 2460 livb112 shows two pair, Nines and Eights Hero shows two pair, Aces and Eights Hero wins 2460 ( won +1230 ) livb112 lost -1230 He makes a very reasonable jam with 99, which is obviously a far preferable outcome to us check/calling the flop and checking the turn. We take the 4-man down.
great read, tyty