Hello all, first post to the forum!1. So the title says it all. Which one has better profit, I mean $/hr expectation? Also if you are some someday good enough to multitable, are either one of these more profitable to multitable then 1 table again thinking about $/hr expectation? I would guess turbo's are harder because you have to think more of betsizings, villains tendencies etc. but not really sure...2. Also I've read somewhere that if you are wanting to play hypers you should first learn turbo's. If that's the case(?) then why so?
1. For pure $/hr, which is all you should really care about, hypers are the way to go. That being said, there is definitely more of a mental game aspect to hypers as the variance is worse. I think the top few earners on sharkscope all play hypers.2. I'm still beginning and I started off with turbo's, however I think that you're much better off just starting out with hypers if that's what you think you'll end up playing anyway. There is a surprising amount of difference between the two (from what I understand, anyway). Can't help with multitabling as I'm not good enouh to try it yet
Not sure, if I can agree with this post.Of course, if you do compare $60 hyper-turbos with $60 turbos the hourly with hypers should be bigger. Than again, there are differences, e.g. in the bank roll managment. While plenty of hyper-turbo regulars use a 75 to 100 BI-brm, there are turbo-regulars which use a 30 to 40 BI BRM. Means: choseing turbos allows you to play in a higher game which takes direct influence on your hourly.You do not have to learn how to play turbos in order to master the hyper turbos. If anything, I would say it is the other way around; you can do some turbo-endgame-training (<25BB) by playing hypers.The knowledge how to play 75BB deep is pretty useless in hyper-turbos.
Hi.
Good point. I didn't take BRM into account. IMO I still think hypers are the way to go though but not by as high a margin as I initially thought.
Good point. I didn't take BRM into account. IMO I still think hypers are the way to go though but not by as high a margin as I initially thought.