I believe saje made that graph based on his own estimated winrates for those specific games, not based on the average person's winrate.

In reality, you have to take into account the time it takes to build up to a certain winrate, the potential winrate you might be able to achieve, the level of competition as you move up, the bankroll required by the variance that your winrate brings on, and many other variables.

But if you make more money playing one game over another, by all means you should play that game.  If you really hate a certain game, I guess you could give up some money to play another game, but if I were making $10 per game at one thing and $5 per game at another and they both took the same amount of time and required the same bankroll, I can't imagine choosing the $5 one.

 Yeah, by no means is 4bb/100 the best winrate you can achieve at cash. It's just that I am absolutely horrendous >100bb deep. I think some people sustain 8-10bb/100. Also, it's easier to play higher stakes at cash.
Follow bigsaje on Twitter -- Follow bigsaje on husng.com

15% meaning ROI? Isn't that really high for 2-tabling the 50's?

15% is hard to do, but possible.

Also is it possible to make 10 to 20 BB/100 at NL100/200 CG.
Depends on tableselection.

Have seen such graphs with winnings of 20k each month at these limits.

 would be interesting to see how someone multitables 8 HU,  according to the graph...

http://www.riskoriented.com/multitabling-part-1.html

View All My Articles