Trying to get a solid end game and am wondering whats the difference. I have only watched a few videos and heard primo talk about Sage and skates talk about Nash.
SAGE is very similar to Nash but I think it's a less precise, easier to remember strategy.
It's been so long since I've used SAGE that I can't even recall it off the top of my head anymore. I used it when I started, but I mostly use a modified version of NASH now.
I haven't modified the table, it's something that would take a lot of time for me. I believe others have done work in this area, with different levels of success. Probably Skates, Tnixon, Big Saje and a few others that I recall.
I also stumble upon students or people I talk to once in awhile that have done the same. I notice a wide variation of success from them. I'm talking about success in creating a new and effective table, not overall poker success (though that varies as well).
SAGE is very similar to Nash but I think it's a less precise, easier to remember strategy.
It's been so long since I've used SAGE that I can't even recall it off the top of my head anymore. I used it when I started, but I mostly use a modified version of NASH now.
You modify nash Rypac? Do you mean you use it as a guidline along with your reads or do you mean you have actually adapated the table itself?
I just modify it with reads basically.
I haven't modified the table, it's something that would take a lot of time for me. I believe others have done work in this area, with different levels of success. Probably Skates, Tnixon, Big Saje and a few others that I recall.
I also stumble upon students or people I talk to once in awhile that have done the same. I notice a wide variation of success from them. I'm talking about success in creating a new and effective table, not overall poker success (though that varies as well).