For me its stunning 180% in under 40 games at 11.5`s. In the normal games its 0%. Why is that? Is it better to play those games? As everytime when you win one game you win one buy-in as a "free" and you can lose 3 games and win 1 to be break even. I think those games are pretty easy or then I am just running super well.
Well, 40 games is an extremely small sample size so the ROI shouldn't really be that significant. I'm not that familiar with the 4mans, but I would think a 10% ROI would be good for a good player at them.
Yes I know that 180% is just a heater. I dont get it. Why I am playing so bad in 2man and winning almost every 4man. It looks crazy on the paper. I play 300 games of breakeven 2man, but win over 500$ from the 4man in a supersmall sample.