Knowing if 2, 3 or 4% is the most realistic isn't very important! Just play and win and then tell us how good you did after thousands of games :)I would imagine 3-6% ROI is what you'll see the best players have. Not sure what the best realistic true winrates will be though. Most people move up after awhile, so I doubt you'll see many true 4%+ winners sticking around for thousands of games at those levels.
If my formula is correct...Wins (of 100) = x (if anyone wonders I used 100 beacuse then the number of wins equals the win percent)Buyin = brake = rx= 100b/(2b-r)You need to have the following ITM % to break even.3.5 --> 50.7%7 --> 50.5%15 --> 50.5%30 --> 50.5%
Now i think the formula is correct.....Wins (of 100) = x Buyin = brake = rroi = R (1 % --> R=0.1)x = (b*(100 + R*100))/(2*b - 2*r)This gives that if you want an roi of 5% you need to win 53,64% at the $7 level Validation calculation:(53,64*13,7 - 100*7)/(7*100) = (734,868-700)/700 = 34,868/700 = 5%
All the important things. Nobody wants to talk about them!!!
Knowing if 2, 3 or 4% is the most realistic isn't very important! Just play and win and then tell us how good you did after thousands of games :)I would imagine 3-6% ROI is what you'll see the best players have. Not sure what the best realistic true winrates will be though. Most people move up after awhile, so I doubt you'll see many true 4%+ winners sticking around for thousands of games at those levels.
If my formula is correct...Wins (of 100) = x (if anyone wonders I used 100 beacuse then the number of wins equals the win percent)Buyin = brake = rx= 100b/(2b-r)You need to have the following ITM % to break even.3.5 --> 50.7%7 --> 50.5%15 --> 50.5%30 --> 50.5%
Now i think the formula is correct.....Wins (of 100) = x Buyin = brake = rroi = R (1 % --> R=0.1)x = (b*(100 + R*100))/(2*b - 2*r)This gives that if you want an roi of 5% you need to win 53,64% at the $7 level Validation calculation:(53,64*13,7 - 100*7)/(7*100) = (734,868-700)/700 = 34,868/700 = 5%
I doubt that this formula is correct.You see, if you use 2*b, you also have substract the rake twice.
Hi.
Must have misscalculate when i checked the formula, my misstake