Villain only 3betting 16% of hands. All my calcs say the call is right, plus with effective stack size at 11bb villains range is probably getting looser. Still, as I'm quite likely behind - would you hold out for a better spot?
50/100 No Limit Holdem • 2 Players • FullTiltPoker
$1 Heads-Up Sit & Go
Hand Conversion Powered by WeakTight.com
| BB | surfbrazil | 1145 | |
| SB | hero | 1855 | |
Effective Stacks: 11bb
Blinds 50/100
- Pre-Flop (150, 2 players) Hero is SB
hero raises to 300, surfbrazil goes all-in 1145, hero calls 845
- Flop (2290, 2 players, 1 all-in)
- Turn (2290, 2 players, 1 all-in)
- River (2290, 2 players, 1 all-in)
- Final Pot: 2290
- surfbrazil shows a full house, Aces full of Twos
- hero shows two pair, Aces and Twos
- surfbrazil wins 2290 ( won +1145 )
- hero lost -1145
You probably shouldnt 3x pre.
If 16% is an overall 3-betting stat, including non-all-in 3bets at deeper stacks, it has very little bearing on his 3bet jamming range at 11bbs.
Once you did 3x, if "all your calcs" say that calling gets you more chips on avg than folding, then you should call. Anyway I can't imagine thinking a 3x/fold is a good approach here overall.
What "Nash chart" are you referring to? The standard one does not apply to this situation.
You can never raise-fold here after opening to 3x. It's a raise-call or just open shove.
Thanks All.