2 posts / 0 new
Last post
it1111's picture
Some fun hands

Hi guys,
I never post hands but this weekend played two 30$ games against a player who deserves the title "Best player ever". I couldn't believe that this type of player still exist. Who is saying that games are getting tougher and tougher???
And of course, I lost both games... sad

 

PokerStars, $29.37+$0.63 USD Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2014/10/04 16:26:19 ET
Table '988887454 1' 2-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: villain(300 in chips)
Seat 2: hero (700 in chips)
hero: posts small blind 10
villain: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to hero [3s Th]
hero: calls 10
villain: checks
*** FLOP *** [Tc 7h 3d]
villain: checks
hero: bets 30
villain: calls 30
*** TURN *** [Tc 7h 3d] [7s]
villain: checks
hero: checks
*** RIVER *** [Tc 7h 3d 7s] [6c]
villain: checks
hero: bets 50
villain: calls 50
*** SHOW DOWN ***
hero: shows [3s Th] (two pair, Tens and Sevens)
villain: mucks hand
hero collected 200 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 200 | Rake 0
Board [Tc 7h 3d 7s 6c]
Seat 1: villain(big blind) mucked [2d Jc]
Seat 2: hero (button) (small blind) showed [3s Th] and won (200) with two pair, Tens and Sevens

 

PokerStars, $29.37+$0.63 USD Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2014/10/04 16:24:36 ET
Table '988887454 1' 2-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: villain(500 in chips)
Seat 2: hero (500 in chips)
villain: posts small blind 10
hero: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to hero [Ks 4s]
villain: raises 20 to 40
hero: calls 20
*** FLOP *** [2c Qd 4d]
hero: checks
villain: checks
*** TURN *** [2c Qd 4d] [Jd]
hero: checks
villain: checks
*** RIVER *** [2c Qd 4d Jd] [4h]
hero: bets 80
villain: calls 80
*** SHOW DOWN ***
hero: shows [Ks 4s] (three of a kind, Fours)
villain: mucks hand
hero collected 240 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 240 | Rake 0
Board [2c Qd 4d Jd 4h]
Seat 1: villain(button) (small blind) mucked [8h 5h]
Seat 2: hero (big blind) showed [Ks 4s] and won (240) with three of a kind, Fours

 

 

 

PokerStars, $29.37+$0.63 USD Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level III (20/40) - 2014/10/04 16:21:37 ET
Table '988873247 1' 2-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: villain(650 in chips)
Seat 2: hero (350 in chips)
hero: posts small blind 20
villain: posts big blind 40
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to hero [9h 9d]
hero: raises 40 to 80
villain: calls 40
*** FLOP *** [Tc 2s Qd]
villain: checks
hero: checks
*** TURN *** [Tc 2s Qd] [Qs]
villain: checks
hero: checks
*** RIVER *** [Tc 2s Qd Qs] [7d]
villain: checks
hero: bets 60
villain: calls 60
*** SHOW DOWN ***
hero: shows [9h 9d] (two pair, Queens and Nines)
villain: mucks hand
hero collected 280 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 280 | Rake 0
Board [Tc 2s Qd Qs 7d]
Seat 1: villain(big blind) mucked [6d 3s]
Seat 2: hero (button) (small blind) showed [9h 9d] and won (280) with two pair, Queens and Nines

4 card brett's picture
why not bet bigger on the

why not bet bigger on the river with the K4 hand if he is calling down with junk?

also why not shove preflop with the 99 pp when he is such a calling station ?