Note: To read our 2014 interview with Daniel, click HERE.
Charles Hawk: What was your first impressions of the format when you started grinding Spins and how has it changed/developed in the process?
Daniel 'Pl@yerABC' Sklar: When PokerStars started Spins, I was mainly a heads-up player. My thinking was: "Why not give it a try? I will play few of those tournaments - just for fun." After finishing first Spin session I was hooked. Recreational players in big quantities and instant action on multiple tables. What more can you ask for? After a lot of battling in $60 division against good opponents I could not believe my eyes. Are we back to the great Party Poker era? People shoving 72-offsuit type of hand 25 bb deep (only because this was only 2x multiplier and they wanted to quickly end the table and move on to a bigger multiplier game). So I immediately made a decision - to make a transition from $60 heads-up to Spins.
OK, Spins are not all sunshine and rainbows. More and more regs are finding their way into the game. Initially I was registering myself manually and was playing against recreational players almost exclusively. Today I am using SpinWiz software (which by the way works great). I don't like waiting in queue so a lot of my games are against one reg and one recreational player - still fine, but not what it was in the early days of Spins.
One other aspect why Spins are great for winning professional players - you never know the multiplier for your next tournament - so the big win could be just around the corner. You can use this fact to motivate yourselft to put more volume.
Charles Hawk: What are the main traps, leaks in theory for husngs players when transitioning to spins?
Daniel 'Pl@yerABC' Sklar: Spin tournament has two distinct phases. 3-handed and heads-up. Maybe it is not obvious at a first glance, but 3-handed game is a completely different world. I was really surprised how adding just one more player changes the game's dynamics completely. When I play heads up, almost any hand looks good - 73s is suited, 54o is connector, K2o is king high and that might be enough at a showdown. Modern heads up play is insanely loose. I am playing lots of hands heads up - there is only one villain after all. But playing 3-handed at a Spin table is a different story. In recent months I have slowly learned, that sometimes hitting FOLD button preflop is a necessary evil if I want to be a winning player.
In my opinion, experience in heads up play is a big advantage in Spin format. But also heads-up players need to be careful - they should not underestimate complexity of the 3-handed play!
Charles Hawk: Is your hourly bigger than playing Spins? What is more fun to play? How many tables do you play at once? Are you going for SNE?
Daniel 'Pl@yerABC' Sklar:
Hourly:
When I was playing HU (6 months ago), I was mainly waiting in queue. With Spins I am not wasting time waiting for games, instant action against recreational players is available around the clock. So when we speak about hourly rates, I prefer Spins over HU.
Fun:
Spins are more fun for me. Lots of action around the clock. 3-handed game is new for me and provides many interesting situations to think about.
Multitabling:
I am not a fast button clicker. So I prefer to play only 4 tables at once. Sometimes people ask me questions in chat (like e.g. Why are you sitting me?). I would like to communicate but playing four tables and chatting at the same time is too much for me.
SNE?
No. I have lot of other activities. I am not playing that much.
Charles Hawk: Any differences between a heads up game in Spins, when you have 25 big blinds or less, and a husng match?
Daniel 'Pl@yerABC' Sklar: Yes, there are some differences.
- In Spins I have other tables going. Sometimes I play heads up matches against 4 different people - so it is harder to focus on specific weaknesses and make correct adjustments. Even If I play one heads up and 3 other tables are still 3-handed - I can not focus solely on one opponent - so I probably play worse than in a similar situation at Heads Up table.
- Battling at HU tables involves instant rematches. There is no such thing at Spins. I think that playing longer against same opponent magnifies the differences between their skills. This argument cuts both ways. When I play against a recreational player at a Spins table, I don't have that much time to figure out their play. On the other hand, when I am up against $500 reg I am happy that he has only few hands to try to figure out my play.
- Interesting situation arises when there is let's say 10x multiplier and you are heads-up against recreational player. Here I am not trying to maximize my chipEV, but I am trying to maximize my chance of winning. Or to put it differently - here comes into play that idea "waiting for a better spot" more familiar to MTT players.
why isnt there a graph?
Really don't understand why HUSNG promote SPIN'S every day and every article. More articles now we had about SPIN'S then HUSNG.
You should create another site, example: SPIN.COM and talk only about Spin's and leave this site to HUSNG.com for HUSNG players.
gaga1005> thank you for the opinion! In general I agree that there should be more interviews about HUSNG... However its not very easy to find new husng regs for an interview. If there is anyone who wishes give me one (or know who could want it) - please write me a PM!
I am always looking for new interview opportunities with HUSNG and Spin Reg's who play $30s and higher. Please PM me here or on 2p2 (Charles Hawk).
The closest format to Spins is HUSNGs, half the game is played as a HUSNG. Therefore, many players are playing both games, winners and losers alike. There is a lot of value in learning short stack HU play in both games, it's cross applicable.
In recent months, many HUSNG players are excited to be playing Spins, so they want to answer some Spins questions.
The last interview was a two part interview, it had one part HUSNGs, one part about Spins.
HUSNGs have probably been halved as far as population goes. They are still very profitable, but they're more comparable to 2010-2011 than they are to 2012-2013. If we just live off of HUSNGs on this site, our budget may not allow for many interviews, or as many videos, etc. Working with both games, since they are so similar, allows the site not only to keep the same size, but also to potentially expand into new areas and products.
An example would be software. We used to only do videos, now we do some videos with software and interviews, not to mention private staking program exclusive training and more.